tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-492174345240444269.post4665065681204150899..comments2023-09-09T14:46:37.354+02:00Comments on Julien Frisch: Comitology 2.0: Commission doesn't want parliamentary rights under Article 291 TFEUJulien Frischhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18167141111642456560noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-492174345240444269.post-75780826397458087382010-05-25T13:16:33.204+02:002010-05-25T13:16:33.204+02:00The EP report on this draft regulation is going to...The EP report on this draft regulation is going to be voted on 23 June, with votes on 'opinions' by twelve committees between 1 and 22 June. <br /><br />I - Ries Baeten - have a hand in preparing one of the opinions, so feel free to propose texts and I will give you my judgment. But please take the trouble, first, to go through the meeting documents available on the Parliament's committee websites. <br /><br />The hot item here is to delete article 10, as proposed by the Opinion rapporteurs of both ENVI and AGRI.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-492174345240444269.post-82282025091612336752010-05-06T12:53:57.228+02:002010-05-06T12:53:57.228+02:00Maybe the stagiaire who wrote this summary should ...Maybe the stagiaire who wrote this summary should have spent a little bit more time revising it, but I think this means the Commission's position is that the "scrutiny powers" of the Council and the Parliament already follow sufficiently from the Treaty, so that there is no need to repeat them in the Comitology Decision. This is also the reading that is most consistent with the interventions of the two MEPs who are also mentioned in the summary.<br /><br />If I am correct about this, it follows that the Commission representative had no intention of suggesting that the scrutiny powers of the other two institutions should be reduced.martinnedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15282998467090268537noreply@blogger.com