tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-492174345240444269.post5173814681211533220..comments2023-09-09T14:46:37.354+02:00Comments on Julien Frisch: History blogging: Why is SCIFA still there?Julien Frischhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18167141111642456560noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-492174345240444269.post-81309164703561507792010-05-21T10:27:21.646+02:002010-05-21T10:27:21.646+02:00What about the Article 36 committee? AFAIK, it sti...What about the Article 36 committee? AFAIK, it still exists, right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-492174345240444269.post-52378721155981927682010-05-19T00:29:32.365+02:002010-05-19T00:29:32.365+02:00Looking at the document you linked, I'd imagin...Looking at the document you linked, I'd imagine the "many" delegations weren't sufficiently many to abolish SCIFA. (I'm not sure whether that would take a simple or a qualified majority.) Looking at the language in that paragraph, I'd guess that "many" refers to about 10-15 MS, with 5-10 more undecided and the final 5-10 against.<br /><br />If there had been a QMV-sized majority in favour of abolishing this Committee, I'd think they would have written it down differently.martinnedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15282998467090268537noreply@blogger.com