Saturday, 9 May 2009

European Parliament elections 2009 (99): The official campaign spot - a total fail

On EuroparlTV I stumbled over what is announced to be the official EP campaign spot - and it must be this one because I saw pictures of the "making of" on La Oreja de Europa:



To be honest: Nobody will really get this message. It's totally uninteresting. It has no line or element that people would want to talk about (unlike the viral campaign). It's only loosely linked to the billboard campaign. The style is not catching. Europe has not much of a role in it. And only few will understand that the issues are actually linked to the European Union.

For me, that is a complete fail!

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

EU news and European blogging: Between domination and ignorance

This week I am guest blogging on TH!NK ABOUT IT. I will publish the articles here, too, but I would like to kindly ask you to comment on TH!NK09. This is my fourth article, which you also can find here.

I usually don't write about Europe-related things that make it on the first pages of newspapers or that get the attention of national newscasters.

The attention of the public is regularly attracted to some specific European topics - like the "new" Eastern Partnership this week - because all major broadcasters and newspaper report about it.

On these days, you can find hundreds of commentators, media "insiders", interviewees, and the rest of the "racaille" (to use a famous quote of Nicolas Sarkozy) jumping into the pool and then crying for the attention of the public as compensation for their inability to swim.

All you can do as a blogger with these topics is to commentate, drop a little sarcastic remark into the rain forest of noise and hope that a little Golden Lion Tamarin will find and play with it to forget for a moment that it belongs to an endangered species.

There is no need to join the masses, to obey to cries of help of a fast-moving industry. European blogging - which too often, even in my case, becomes EU blogging - is of no added value when it follows the rhythms set by others.

European blogging should try to set agendas off the beaten tracks.

We all have a limited capacity to digest new information, although my generation is forcing up the amount of (diverse) information consumed, although some media junkies like us are following several hundred sources daily. This is why we make choices. The difference to the past is that we expose ourselves to a larger amount of choices, but we still just chose a limited number of news for more thorough scrutiny.

When I read big news, news that is repeated over a number of news sources, I usually just read the headline, maybe one article, rarely more. Why? Because I know that since it has made it into the sphere of public attention, it will be repeated over and over again, so the combination of different headlines I scan will give me the overview I need.

The problem is that big news, especially big news on European topics, is quickly dominating the agenda, it occults all "minor" stories. If EU blogs join this media round dance, we will just reenforce the present gap between a complex reality and the journalistic herd instinct towards big stories.

If you read my blog, you will often find little quotes from documents that seem unimportant, minor, hardly relevant. Boring administrative stuff, not worth of attention. You can call it geekish, but the truth is that unimportant administrative stuff of today quite often becomes big news tomorrow.

Take, just as an example, my recent article on the restructuring of the European Parliament secretariat. Sure, during this week, the attention on European matters was on the last session of the European Parliament and on the Eastern Partnership. But the little details quoted in my article - e.g. the remark on information technologies - might influence the work of the new European Parliament more than one or another MEP elected into the next EP.

In fact, I don't know.

But I can make guesses. As a blogger, I can take the risk to report about details irrelevant by now, just based on the assumption that they could have an effect in the future. I can allow myself to deviate from the highway of big news and just walk right across the meadow. Either I find a shorter track to the destination than those stuck in the highway jams or at least I will be able to listen to the crickets chirp and smell the perfume of fresh grass.

European blogging for me is a way to add little bits of cricket chirr to the noise of the information highway. Most of the time, it is not heard, and that's perfectly okay. But sometimes, somebody like me will come to my meadow and listen, just like I come and listen to the chirps of others. And if the highway noise stops at night, and when one day we all chirp together, the residents nearby won't be able to sleep.

What I want to say with this incredible chain of cliché metaphors, forbidden in most journalistic texts and even hard to stand in a blog article, is that we should take the risk to blog about little details of European affairs. When I read other blogs, I appreciate the hint to a little event that tells more about the state of the Union than a pathetic comment to the diplomatically ironed conclusion of a European Council.

The ignored detail is the true basis of democracy, of social life, while the big news is just a momentary wave crest. Europe and the European Union have too many ignored details, and we bloggers can give meaning to them by creating relations, by showing how little events or seemingly unimportant administrative documents relate to each other and to the big news.

If European blogging becomes the related writing on ignored details, it might be able to counterbalance the weight of a few major news sources reporting about the big EU issues, mostly singular events based on years of ignorance. We would be able to tell that we cared about the details long before they reached the surface, and we would be able to object to all those who will interpret these events as if there was no past and no background.

But the best thing is: If it doesn't work, it doesn't matter.

The ignored stories we write and read can still be entertaining, funny, shocking. European blogging and reading European blogs is first and foremost a matter of fun, of interest. It doesn't hurt if this is not big news. For me it is enough to know that there are more things going on beside the heads of state and government are meeting.

And in the end, reading ignored but interesting European blogs is also a way to ignore dominant EU news. I use it as a silent personal critique to those journalists and bloggers who follow the stream, by not paying attention to them, by not devoting my precious time to their uncreativeness, and instead offering it to a bunch of active citizens investing their free time in caring for smaller and larger details.

Friday, 8 May 2009

EU citizens in Germany: Register until 17 May for European Parliament elections!

EU citizens living in Germany who want to vote at the European Parliament elections in Germany have to register until 17 May 2009 at their local administration!

The press release of the Federal Returning Officer:
2009 European Election: deadline for application of Germans living abroad and Union citizens ending on 17 May

WIESBADEN – The Federal Returning Officer points out that from three aspects 17 May 2009 is an important key date in the run-up to the 2009 European Election. Until that day, Germans living abroad and Union citizens in Germany who intend to vote here have to apply for entry in the voters’ register. By 17 May 2009, all persons entitled to vote in the European election will have received their notification on which the polling station will be indicated where they may cast their vote on 7 June 2009.

As a rule, the names of those wishing to cast their votes in Germany in the 2009 European Election have to be entered in a voters’ register. The voters’ register lists all persons entitled to vote in a polling district. All those eligible to vote who were registered with the municipal registration office of their main place of residence on 3 May 2009, the 35th day before the election, will ex officio be entered in the voters’ register and receive a voter’s notification.

As soon as possible, Germans living abroad who wish to vote in Germany have to file an application for entry in the voters’ register of the municipality where they were last registered before leaving Germany. The application must have been received by the municipality by 17 May 2009. Germans living abroad who upon application had been entered in a voters’ register at the last European Election in 2004 need to file another such application for the 2009 European Election. More detailed information and the application form are available to Germans living abroad from all embassies and consulates of the Federal Republic of Germany or on the website of the Federal Returning Officer.

Citizens of other EU member states living in Germany who wish to elect the German members in the 2009 European Election also need to have their names entered in a German voters’ register. To this end, they have to file an application for entry in the voters’ register with the municipal authority of their German place of residence. The application must have been received there by 17 May 2009. An exception to this rule are Union citizens who had been entered in the voters’ register for the 2004 European Election and since then have not been deleted from the voters’ register upon application or because they moved to a foreign country: they will ex officio be entered in the voters’ register. Union citizens in Germany may obtain more detailed information and the application form from the municipal authority where they live or on the website of the Federal Returning Officer.

From 18 up to and including 22 May 2009, the voters’ registers may be inspected by persons entitled to vote at the respective municipal authorities during general opening hours. Citizens who will not have received a voters’ notification by 17 May 2009 but think they are nevertheless entitled to vote should contact the electoral office at their main place of residence without further delay so that the decision can be reviewed.
So EU citizens in Germany, register and make that the the expat vote is not as low as expected!

Thursday, 7 May 2009

European Parliament elections 2009 (98): Be prepared (to be scared)!

Beautiful. And different to Kosmopolit I like the screams, watched it again, and even discovered a little detail I didn't remark the first time I watched it.

PART 1



PART 2



I suppose, the Death represents the global crisis or the overrated pandemic influence...

Update: Jon Worth made an anti-UKIP remix.

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Twitter knows everything: A special EP campaign blog on Liberation.fr

Only through Twitter I realised that Liberation.fr has installed a special blog covering the European Parliament elections. And the Eurojunkie is writing there, too!

Oh Twitter, what would we do without you?! How slow news were spread before you existed, how unimportant some blog posts seemed until they were retweeted five times in a row.

And if you still don't know what Twitter is... ask Falk who explains Twitter on Twitter in 140 characters:
The easiest way to describe twitter for those who knew collaboration tools: it mixed rss with comments and social bookmarking in blog style.
Oh yes, and after you have spent 24 hours tweeting:

Don't forget to check out the blog I mentioned earlier!

Guest post on "Th!nk About It" (3): A visible opposition in the European Parliament

This week I am guest blogging on TH!NK ABOUT IT. I will publish the articles here, too, but I would like to kindly ask you to comment on TH!NK09. This is my third article, which you also can find here.

One might be as europhile as I am (and just a little remark: I still would not call myself "EUrophile" with a capital U, but rather "EUroptimistic" or simply "europhile"), but I can understand to a certain extend many of those who have doubts about the European project called "European Union".

And so, given that this week we are witnessing the last session of this European Parliament in this period, let me express high appreciation for Daniel Hannan who, in his probably last speech in front of this parliament, has again shown that you can be eurosceptic, critical, and even tastefully polemic, but that this can be done in the most intelligent, articulate, and honest way.

His call for a "visible opposition against the EU" in the next European Parliament is thus not to be understood in a negative manner, but in the best tradition of a democratic institutions in which the pro and the contra are the main elements of free and democratic discourse of ideas and ideals.

And he is absolutely correct pointing out that it is better to allow and to support open and democratic opposition - even against the project as such - within the institution than waiting for radicals and xenophobic opponents outside the parliament to be the sole voices of discontent heard all over Europe.

So here's Daniel's speech, as always short and concise, and with remarkably warm words for outgoing EP president Hans-Gert Pöttering:



Thank you, Daniel, for your work and your directness - and I suppose you will be around...!

Wednesday, 6 May 2009

Restructuring of the European Parliament secretariat

Klaus Welle, the new Secretary General of the European Parliament, has announced changes to the EP secretariat as well as a closer look to issues of information technology:
"An exchange of views took place with Mr WELLE, the new Secretary General of the EP [...] his first appearance in the BUDG Committee since his appointment, on 15 March 2009. The new Secretary General highlighted the main points of his program for reshuffling the Secretariat General of the EP. The main changes would concern the Personnel DG, which would be divided into three Directorates [until now there are two directorates; JF]. He underlined the importance of a better definition of the Staff Regulations and modernisation of the promotion, mobility and appointment procedures.

Mr WELLE stressed the increasing importance of infrastructures and concluded that a new Directorate was needed. The new Directorate would be given more tasks such as building maintenance. The collapse of the ceiling in Strasbourg revealed the need for staff specialised in maintenance, which is lacking among EP personnel.

Information Technologies was another central element of Mr WELLE's programme as Secretary General. He considered that this central issue of governance had hardly been discussed at a sufficiently high level over the last 10 years.
"
(Source: Report on the meeting of the European Parliament Committee on Budgets held in Brussels on 27 April 2009, made by the Council Secretariat for the member states)

Simplicity

We need a European Union that is simple, democratic, and transparent.

We would like to see more powers for the European Parliament, we know that the subsidiarity principle should be respected, and we demand that the European Union speaks with one voice in foreign policy matters.

The EU should guarantee the four (or five) fundamental freedoms, it should be social and fair, it should protect the interest of the people and the interests of the member states. We ask for a European Union that is working intensively without costing too much.

Sovereignty should be maintained while supranationalism is achieved. The regions need to have their word to say, and the European Court of Justice has to make sure that EU law is respected all over the Union.

We want to protect 500 Million people from harm and global warming, but no institution should unnecessarily interfere into the lives of EU citizens and residents. The European Union should encourage peace and disarmament all over the world, and it needs efficient and well-trained armed forces to handle regional crises and fight terrorism.

Multilingualism should be the aim for every citizens, but the institutions shall not be confined by too many working languages. Minority rights have to be respected, but the majority should decide in referenda about the future of the Union.

Enlargement has to remain an option for European states not yet members of the Union, but enlarging the EU makes it less operational and causes more conflict.

We want a European Union that is simple, democratic, and transparent. And everything else.

More simplicity is an illusion.

Tuesday, 5 May 2009

European Parliament elections 2009 (97): Don't vote!

Seven month ago I have seen this American campaign and I have asked five questions.

They have been answered almost completely - and in a very beautiful way:



So please: DON'T VOTE from 4-7 June 2009!

(sponsored by the Foundation of Political Innovation, France)

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Guest post on "Th!nk About It" (2): Where should I be on election day?

This week I am guest blogging on TH!NK ABOUT IT. I will publish the articles here, too, but I would like to kindly ask you to comment on TH!NK09. This is my second article, which you also can find here.

I chose to write a rather heavy post for yesterday, the first day of my guest blogging, as food for thought and discussions for the whole week, but today I'll keep it a bit lighter and much more constructive.

In fact, I would like to use the opportunity of this platform to ask a question that has to do with these elections as well as with you and me:
Where should I be on election day?
For those of you who might doubt: This is not a rhetoric question!

One of the goals of this project, TH!NK09, is to connect people interested in European issues and new communication technologies. Real-life encounters and online communication are supposed to be mutually stimulating, across borders but along a common topic - the European Parliament elections 2009. And despite the critique I expressed yesterday, I still see some positive impulses coming from this platform.

Since this is inspiring and since in general I share the view that blogging and the "offline world" need to be connected, I want to undertake a little more effort in this direction...

To make it short:

At least on the last day of the elections from 4-7 June 2009, I would like to be someplace in the European Union, mainly to meet new people and to get an interesting final perspective on the EP elections, but also to report about my experiences afterwards.

The easiest solution would be to go to Brussels. I could stay for some days, meet some people I know from previous activities or through blogging, talk to representatives from the European parties, discuss with Brussels-based journalists and look at these elections from a central perspective - if not geographically then for sure politically.

The second posibility would be to go to another European capital. I could try to get a glimpse at the last moments of the national campaign, talk to different political activists, make some billboard sightseeing and capture some reactions to the final results. In this way I would get the most typical view on these European elections - from a national perspective - in my case just a different one.

Or, I could go somewhere outside the centres of the European Union and its member states. I could go to a little town in the "periphery", talk to people living there about their feelings towards these elections and about the role the EU plays for them. I would visit the local election commission, eat some simple food and drink a glass of local alcoholic beverage while discussing about what really matters there.

TThese are all clichés of the European Union and the reporting about these elections. There are hundreds of nuances between these three examples, but in the end, they constitute the basic choices I have.

Still, you may be much more creative than these examples!

So here is the deal:

You propose me where I should go for the election day(s).

Propose me to come to your town, make a good point for a European capital or tell me about a remote place from where you would like to hear a story about the EP elections.

What is important is that there is a good reason to go there; it should make sense for you, for me, or for the electoral process that I am at this place during the elections.

The only condition from my side would be that I can reach the place via train within 24 hours from Berlin (plus a boat if that's the only way) and that I can find a relatively cheap place to sleep.

You can make proposals in the comments and discuss them. You can ask other bloggers to join if they like. You can even collectively agree on a place or make a vote. I don't care. I won't interfere in these discussions until the end of the week, except for questions that need an answer from my side.


And at the end of the week, on Sunday evening, I will chose the most interesting, the most convincing option or proposal and then start making preparations for the trip.

Monday, 4 May 2009

Guest post on "Th!nk About It" (1): Why there are no true Europe-wide election campaigns - and why I am I a little bit disappointed with TH!NK09

This week I am guest blogging on TH!NK ABOUT IT. I will publish the articles here, too, but I would like to kindly ask you to comment on TH!NK09.

The first questions I wanted to tackle are the following:
Why there are no true Europe-wide election campaigns - and why I am a little bit disappointed with TH!NK09 (so far).
The reason for the first part of the question - apart from the election system that foresees national lists - is very simple:

The national parties would need to construct completely new stories to run a true European election campaign on the national level. They would need to develop new arguments, inform themselves about what is going on on the European level, get in touch with their MEPs and discuss about goals and possibilities, something they haven't done for years.

But national political parties don't care for what is going on in Brussels and Strasbourg, they are centred in their little world of local, regional, and national self-content.

Yet, European politics demand particular involvement, because news about what is going on usually doesn't leave the halls and offices of the EU institutions, apart from a small number of highly mediatised issues. And what parties don't find in the media is not relevant for their national party functionaries (if you exclude a limited number of individuals dealing with European matters on a more regular basis).

But for a true European campaign, the national parties would not only have to construct a new story, but they would need to explain this story to voters who are used to be confronted with national argumentations only.

So a European campaign would involve double work for national parties: First, they would have to spend time to build their new story line, with good ideological arguments and practical examples, and then they would need to invest much more time and effort than for most other elections to make voters understand these new stories. That is a lot of work...

Hence, running a national campaign for the European elections is the easiest solution for national parties.

It is pure laziness, unwillingness to make new things and to face inconvenient questions that could reveal that, in fact, almost nobody within the national political parties cared about the European Parliament's activities for the last five years. And if not even the political parties cared - how can you expect citizens to care?!

Sure, some of the competitors will still manage to project their political goals and ideologies to the European level, promising peace, prosperity, solidarity and freedom all over Europe. The European parties are helping by creating European manifestos and slogans which can be used as guidelines to hide the national character of the campaign.

Nevertheless, when you look behind the facades, you'll easily discover that the argument remains national, even though the language becomes Europeanised. Because as I said above, this is the easiest solution for lazy political actors, which mostly also want to use the playing field of the EP elections to gain political points in their national arena.

This is weak. Boring. Mostly irrelevant for what is actually going on in Brussels and Strasbourg.

But the human being is lazy.

And this brings me to TH!NK ABOUT IT and to my disappointment about the results it has brought over the last three months:

What I see is a certain laziness.

At the beginning, over the first weeks, I saw enthusiastic moves and posts and I was glad about the dynamics. But the day-to-day laziness won over the initial enthusiasm.

The average Th!nk-blogger has published 5 articles over the last 90 days, which means around one article every 2 1/2 weeks. And apart from a number of exceptions, the focus was on abstract European issues or on rather irrelevant national questions.

These issues replaced much more interesting national perspectives on European issues of the campaign or European perspectives on national issues connected to these elections.

With three bloggers from every EU country, this community was most appropriate for discussioning these things; yet so far, this opportunity has been missed.

There have still been a number of interesting articles - what comes up to my mind spontaneously are some posts by Lithuanian, Latvian and Slovenian th!nkers - and some of the bloggers have posted much more than the obligatory last-day-of-the-month post I could witness when my RSS-feed exploded on the 28th, 30th and 31st.

But tranquillised by the seemingly nothingness of a European campaign, many bloggers of this competition seemed to have resigned, maybe also discouraged by the fact that only few "outsiders" showed open interest in what was written.

In the end, the focus on apparently more important personal goals has suppressed the responsibility as a European citizen with a perfect platform to do what this European Union lacks, that is to foster true European debates, to care for what is really relevant, and to be ahead instead of lagging behind.

But why should TH!NK ABOUT IT be better than what we get for the European Parliament elections?

What we get before these European elections is a lack of enthusiasm, a lack of creativity, a lack of understanding for the important issues in Europe today. What we get is a lack of involvement of the public, that is neither from the side of most individual citizens nor from the civil society that represents them in parties or NGOS.

Still, one thing is sure: If the EU shall not just be an administration that takes over responsibilities from our national democracies without giving more room for European democracy, then we will have to show more impetus, more interest, more active involvement.

What I expect from you, TH!NKERS, for the last month of the European Parliament election campaign is that you create a true pan-European debate:

Criticise the national focus of the parties of your home countries by showing that what they talk about is mostly irrelevant for what is going on in the European Parliament! Take up European level discussions and perspectives and break them down to what they mean for your country!

Or, contribute to a real European discussion by debating all-European issues under an all-European perspective. Relate to each other, quote each other, ask questions, criticise! But no matter what you do: Do at least more than what you have done so far!

Be better than our lazy political parties, our old-fashioned politicians, or our careless media!

This is the only way how we - blogging citizens - can contribute to the future of the European Union:

By being better Europeans than those before and those around us!

La Quadrature du Telecoms Package

La Quadrature du Net asks all of us to address MEPs before their Wednesday's session to prevent them from passing the "Telecoms package" in a way that would restrict citizens' rights and which would endanger the neutrality of the net:
“Call your MEPs and tell them to vote to protect Citizens rights. Direct opposition to the Council of EU is preferable to steps backwards on fundamental rights and freedoms, especially concerning Internet, which is so vital in structuring the future of our societies. Moreover the Citizens' Right Amendments do not directly oppose to the compromise negotiated with the Council, they strengthen it.” concludes Jérémie Zimmermann, co-founder of La Quadrature du Net.
More on La Quadrature du Net.

European Parliament elections 2009 (96): The insignificance of the expat vote

If the figures presented by EurActiv last week are correct, then many EU citizens living in another EU country won't vote, at least not in their new place of residence.

The number of EU expacts having registered where they live seems to be really low, 3% in Poland, about 4,6% in Greece, 11.2% in Belgium, 16,9% in Sweden. Only Cyprus seems to have a better percentage.

This doesn't necessarily mean they won't vote at all, depending on whether they might still be registered in their home country and would be able to vote by mail. However, I don't think that this will be a significant number and we might get an insignificant expat vote in the next month.

It fits into the picture of these elections, and it's probably the irony of the system that those who might actually profit the most from the EU - mobile EU citizens living in another EU country - will not be able to vote (or worse: are not interested in voting).

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Sunday, 3 May 2009

European Parliament elections 2009 (95): Campaign and party communication in Slovenia

After a very good and concise analysis on Th!nk09, Tanja summarises the communication activities of political parties in Slovenia like this:
The parties mostly use their web sites for basic announcements about the EP elections, but only in 2 cases directly address the voters with a special EP section. And what I have not mentioned regarding the campaigning? Yes, you are right: they do not have direct links to the common European campaigns which reassures a well known, bitter national taste….
I think this fits into the picture that we see all over the European Union.

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Un dimanche dans la crise en Europe

La crise nous préoccupe, mais nous sommes plutôt occupés par la vie.

On commence le dimanche avec un café, en écoutant le gazouillement des oiseaux derrière la fenêtre et en lisant le gazouillement des gens sur Twitter.

On écrit quelques mots scientifiques et on se demande pourquoi dans une domaine si importante personne n'a déjà fait des recherches plus profondes.

On sait qu'il fallait ranger un peu, car on veut se présenter assez rangé, mais on se dit que dans cette crise il y a de plus important que cela.

On est heureux - rien de nouveau - de vivre quelque part en Europe.

Europe, c'est le continent où même dans une crise on ne cesse pas de boire un bon café le dimanche matin, de faire la science avec une curiosité enfantine, et de se préoccuper de choses qui seraient des problèmes de luxe dans beaucoup d'autres régions dans le monde.

Un dimanche dans la crise en Europe.

Saturday, 2 May 2009

Rail noise v. railway competitiveness: The Belgian perspective

Just a little piece of high-level EU politics:
"While Belgium recognises that measures should be taken to reduce the adverse effects of railwaynoise at source, it nevertheless insists that such measures must not jeopardise the competitiveness of the railway sector."
(Special statement by Belgium on Item 12 "Greening transport, strategy for the internalisation of external costs and rail noise abatement measures addressing the existing fleet", EU Council meeting 8/9 December 2009 minutes published today)

European Parliament elections 2009 (94): On Libertas

After a short discussion in the comments of a recent post of mine and yesterday's Congress, I wanted to write a post about the not-so-pan-European one-man-show Libertas.

But Ralf was quicker than me, and since I agree totally with his very pertinent questions and comments, let me just link the articles he wrote:
Let me also remind you about Dominika's article on Libertas in Poland, my recent post raising questions about the 80% myth that Ganley and others are using, as well as that there is a whole blog dedicated to anti-Libertas work (although I prefer the more reflected way that Ralf has chosen).

I appreciate that there is a development towards pan-European parties, I even have nothing against pan-European anti-EU parties, but from what I see and hear from Libertas, all that unites them is Ganley and his rejection of the Lisbon Treaty.

For me, Libertas is not a party, but an issue movement tied together by a single person that is not even elected, coveting for power it cannot get but by pretending to be pan- and pro-European, although not much speaks in favour of both of these claims.

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Friday, 1 May 2009

European Parliament elections 2009 (93): Why running for the EP? - An interview with Wim van de Camp (Dutch EP candidate)

An interesting interview by New Europe TV with the head of the Dutch Christian Democratic list for the EP elections 2009, Wim van de Camp, at the EPP Congress in Warsaw.

Mr van de Camp explains what he thinks should be to role of the European Union compared to the tasks of the nation state and tell why he decides to run for the European Parliament after a long career in the Dutch national parliament:



(via NEurope on Twitter)

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

A reaction to "Something unique in elections: a direct democracy model in Hungary"

Since I wasn't able to comment directly, let me reply to the post "Something unique in elections: a direct democracy model in Hungary" by kiazami on Blogactiv.

He writes about a Hungarian party running for the EP elections:
"The system is, that if IDE wins a seat, they will send the first person on their list to Brussels, who can spend there one month then resign and give the seat to the next person on the list, who will spend one month in Brussels as well then resign and so forth.

[...]

They also argue that it is no problem if teir representatives are not the best qualified, since it is not the representatives themselves who are to decide on the issues. The party holds an online voting and their representative votes accordingly. That way they could alloy the direct and representative forms of democracy.
"
Since kiazami seems to like this approach, I would like to react:

If the European Parliament only was about voting, this would be a "funny" thing.

But parliamentary democracy is also about continuity, it is about trust between parliamentarians, and in particular in the European Parliament where individual MEPs have much more to say than in most national parliaments.

A monthly rotating membership would not make this party influential, because it would be unable to build steady relations to other MEPs to influence decisions, it would not be a reliable factor because it would change in ideology and orientation with every new person coming and with every new vote of the internet community.

And they could never be the rapporteur for one of the legislative projects, probably the most influential work an individual MEP can do.

The only persons who would profit from this model were those who would come to Brussels, more like interns than like representatives of the citizens who voted for them. But the idea of democracy is not just to have fun as an individual, and being a parliamentarian is not just a matter of come and go.

So this party may sound like a nice joke, a funny story, but in terms of democracy, neither the Hungarian voter nor the European citizens would gain from this model.

Five years of European Union enlargement: A personal review

I know exactly where I was five years ago, midnight of the first of May 2004, the moment when the European Union was enlarged by 8 Central and Eastern European countries and two countries in the midst of the Mediterranean Sea.

I was in central Berlin, at a special party organised to celebrate the enlargement, and just before 12 we counted down from 10 - and at midnight, a good crowd of mostly young people greeted with joy our new "housemates".

That was a glad moment for Europe and the European Union, and I have to admit, also for me.

As a very francophile person, my eyes and my heart were directed rather to the West at that time. But the enlargement changed this perspective and I used one of the first opportunities to travel trough a number of the new member states. And just some nine month after the enlargement, I even moved to one of the new member states.

This was the start for my Re-Europeanisation, me who was already a convinced European at the time. But I re-centred my view of Europe; I learned to look at Europe as a wider concept, to understand the true meaning of its open space and the ideals of freedom and unity, I realised that Europe and this particular Union of countries were not just a goal to be reached but a potential for more aims to be achieved.

Since the enlargement, I have shared homes/appartments and (new) friendship with Bulgarians, Germans, Ukranians, Finns, Hungarians, Spanish, Estonians, Moldovans, Austrians, Serbs, Russians (the order is random), I've had good relationships to a number of other nationals, and think I have managed to speak to at least one person from almost every country of the continent over the last five years.

The enlargement, no mater what technical problems it might have caused and still causes, was a success, because it opened up perspectives, it enlarged not just the EU but it enlarged our horizons.

Yes, it is sometimes not easy to deal with a larger number of people and countries, because everyone has justified interests, hopes, and visions, every individual and, to a certain extent, every nation. But what we have to understand is that these interests are not really interests of countries and nations, they are, if we take away our national glasses, very similar problems of individuals and groups living in different but still comparable situations.

The average Polish farmer has no different interests to the average French farmer, and the IT specialist from Estonia thinks quite similar to the IT specialist in Ireland. Most people I have met share the wish to have the possibility to move freely - be it for a short trip, for a mid-term exchange, or for a lifetime and be it for 10 kilometres or 2,000 miles - as the potential to realise one's own small and bigger dreams. So we all have a similar story, no matter whether the actors look different and the directors have different styles.

The EU enlargement tells us this story, the story that we are able to integrate the "other" because actually this "other" is a lot like us.

We sometimes get lost in institutional discussions, which are correct because unity in diversity is not always a natural process but the result of well-designed organisational solutions, but the value of enlargement(s) and the perspective for enlargement are driving factors both for those in the club and those who want to join.

Without strong enlargement perspectives, from the Western Balkans, to the East European countries, and, whenever ready also for Turkey, there is no need and impetus to change minds, no need to reform, neither in these countries nor within the European Union. If we remain satisfied with what we have achieved, we lose the vision for what we still can do.

Today, I am celebrating five years of EU enlargement, and I am celebrating it with the hope and wish to soon be able to celebrate the next entries into the Union - also because I have understood another thing over the last years, too:

There is nothing better than to celebrate with fellow Europeans!