Thursday, 16 April 2009

European Parliament elections 2009 (82): Eurotopics' press review on the Eurobarometer results

Eurotopics has a nice little press review with translated article extracts from Luxembourg, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands and Finland on the recent Eurobarometer results that project a low participation rate for the EP elections.

That's worth reading!

Let me also use this opportunity to praise the work of the people from Eurotopics (background information) who provide me and other Europeans with an excellent English language multinational press review (which also exists in German, French and Spanish) every day.

It's taxpayers money involved here, but it is spent for a very good purpose, and it is done in a very pleasant way, so I can only applaud for this initiative!

------------------------------
Under the category "European Parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Wednesday, 15 April 2009

European Parliament elections 2009 (81): PES without vision and without tact

You know from previous posts that I like the way the Party of European Socialists (PES) has managed to develop a European campaign.

But when I see the open letter PES leader Poul Nyrup Rasmussen has written to "attack" the European Liberals and Democrats (ELDR) which start their European campaign today with an event in Brussels, I feel kind of lala.

The positions expressed in the letter may sound social democratic or socialist, but in general they sound rather anti-European and anti-EU.

This is what the European Socialists have to offer? Arguments against the European Union? Amazing. Where have they been over the last 20 years?

The letter doesn't present answers, and it is backwards looking, without much good reasoning. Jon Worth, a social democrat and European blogger, puts forward many good arguments against the propositions of Mr Rasmussen and I don't have much to add besides repeating that this letter sounds deeply anti-EU and is a huge minus for the European Socialists in my eyes. If ELDR campaign people are intelligent enough, that's an easy target...

And another issue regarding campaign strategies:

I have received the open letter in advance yesterday evening from the PES, together with other EU bloggers like Nosemonkey, Kosmopolit or Jon Worth. We were told that we would get this letter in advance exclusively because we were top 10 bloggers for the PES. Still, we were asked not to publish the letter before this morning and to keep an embargo because it would be published in some main(stream) media and would cause great interest.

It's "sweet" (quote from Nosemonkey on Twitter) to be among the top 10 bloggers, and I like to get background information directly from the source instead of living with hearsay. But to be treated like a campaign tool ("You may have exclusive information, but you may only publish them when we want to.") is not very pleasant. And this with a letter of this quality - a letter that didn't cause any great interest so far, at least I haven't seen anything.

If I am among the top bloggers for the PES, I would like to get the exclusive information that Mr Rasmussen will run against Barroso, that he stops beating about the bush, and to do what you expect for a true democratic campaign: To offer a choice to the citizens.

And if I may publish the information exclusively, why not with other bloggers, then I would feel privileged as a blogger. But more important: I would feel happy as an EU citizen - more happy than with a lame letter without good arguments!

------------------------------
Under the category "European Parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Tuesday, 14 April 2009

European Parliament elections 2009 (80): Eurobarometer, Twitter, and piecemeal approaches to the European Dream - corrected

Hm, I realise that this is my 80th blog post on the European Parliament elections. That is not much, taking into account that the first one was published already in early July 2008. At the time I thought there would be many more.

But at the time, I also thought there would be much more attention in the European Parliament elections.

Okay, I admit that there is much more attention than in July 2008. But considering the fact that we are some 7 weeks ahead of one of the largest democratic votes on this planet, "deception" could be the word that describes best how I think about this campaign. And the coverage of what is going on:

Yesterday and today, the most discussed issue in the European news and blogs and Twitter was the latest Eurobarometer survey and the finding that we might face a record low participation. See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here.

Another example of poor reporting on EU-related news. As far as I can see, non of the commentators points to the fact that the Eurobarometer survey has been done in October and November 2008.

[Correction: I suppose Brussels Blogger is right when in his comment he says that the Eurobarometer I link above is not the most recent, although it says publishing date April. The one summarised on the EP site was carried out in January and February.]

For anyone who has followed this blog over the last 8 months it is clear that the visibility of the EP elections in October and November was massively low, even lower than today. If you just take the Wikipedia statistics for the English article on the 2009 EP elections, you will see that in April the peak for daily visitors so far is about 1,100, while the peak during October and November was 332. [Peak in January/February: 608] If we take this as an indicator for attention, it has more than tripled since then [almost doubled since February]. This has to have an effect on voters' intentions, and would bring about different results today.

Notwithstanding, the figures we get in the Eurobarometer are still below expectations, below hopes, below the necessary limits for a democratic legitimacy of the European Parliament.

But not much has happened in this "campaign" that doesn't really deserve the title.

Yes, we get some nice MTV campaigns and we get Twitter election pages popping up and competing with each other for attention: http://eu09.twitlife.com/ vs. http://www.europatweets.eu/.

We also may participate in Twitter and blog discussions on what hashtag should be used on Twitter for the EP elections: #eu09 vs. #ep09 vs. #eu-elect vs. country specific hashtags.

If you want to know who will win, there is a magic scientific prediction machine and a simple survey summary by European news sources. And yes, you have blog coverage of all of these things.

But this is all piecemeal. It is all without particular relevance, it is without heart and mostly without soul. There is almost no discussions about issues, we have to content ourselves with discussions about discussions about the coverage of something that doesn't happen. We content ourselves with Twitterisation, Blogospherity, Euronewsisation, Googelecting. Nothingness. Beautiful and interesting. But empty. It doesn't say much about what we want.

European parties, hear what I want:
  • I want a European Union where I am not asked where I come from but where I am asked where I want to go.
  • I want a European Union where the concept of borders only exist to define spheres of citizen-friendly administration, including clear constituencies for democratically elected bodies.
  • I want a European Union that is transparent, so that I can see from the North of Finland to the South of Portugal, from the doorstep of my house right into the heart of the Council of the European Union.
  • I want a European Union where the town hall secretary of Ireland feels as responsible for the people of her town - nationals, EU citizens, internationals - as she feels responsible for the people living in a Romanian town at the border to Moldova.
  • I want a European Union that is ready for new citizens and new member states, because it defines itself as an open society and not a closed club.
  • I want a European Union where the concrete protection of human rights and individual dignity is always, at any time, more important than the vision of security that threatens a few by humiliating thousands.
  • I want a European Union where citizens, companies, administrations, governments and other collective entities don't spend their time and money trying to make others feel worse but where people wake up and feel responsible for what they do, what they say but also for what they don't do and don't say.
I want that the European Dream - and yes I am dreaming the European Dream - comes true, not all at once, because this is an illusion, but step by step, day by day.

But "step by step" doesn't mean just piecemeal activities of those who like to be important, those who like to be on top while they never cared for the foundations. It isn't just setting up a new tool that summarises another tool that talks about tools (Hashtag: #twitter). "Step by step" to me means to think about how to work together where possible and where necessary, it means that each of us has to step forward on its own whenever we think that we don't move enough.

If I have a vision, if I have ideals, I have to stick to them, I have to pursue them, and I have to think today where my steps might bring me tomorrow and next year. If I have a European Dream, I have to live it, I have to pursue it actively, and yes, before criticising politics and policies of the EU I have to talk about the beauties of this European Union:
  • this European Union that made me translate a whole evening between French and German rabbit breeders in a small German town when I was still a teen;
  • this European Union that makes me feel coming home when I cross the borders of Russia and Estonia, between Ukraine and Poland, between Moldova and Romania, between Croatia and Slovenia, and that made me hope that even those borders will disappear in a not-so-distant future;
  • this European Union that brings together young people and old people, independent of wealth or education, of thousands of backgrounds and intentions, through exchanges, meetings, competitions and that creates friendship and collaboration across lines that used to be borders;
  • this European Union that made me think about the fact that my actions here have a consequence there and that we need - preferably democratic - mechanisms to make this visible every day, mechanisms that allow us to find joint solutions where we can only solve things together;
  • this European Union that has been the environment in which I have grown up most of my life, in which most of my friends live, that influences most of the laws that regulate the small and large details of my life, that makes me angry and happy so often and leaves me indifferent sometimes.
The European Dream might be a vision, some may say an illusion, but the European Union is a reality. And we have two choices: Form this reality so that it gets closer to our dream or let ourselves be formed by the lack of dreams of others. I have chosen the first option, and I feel good about it.

When I started with this series in my blog, I had the same vision that I have today, the vision of a democratic European Union where all citizens - and non-citizens - care for what is going on, and elections are definitely part of "what is going on", because, whether we want it or not, they decide about those people that may help us to live our European Dream - or that might hinder us to come closer to its realisation.

So this is blog post number 80 in the category "European Parliament elections 2009". I didn't know where it would lead me when I started to write it, but it has led me from a Eurobarometer survey to the European Dream - a small step for a blogger, but still a giant leap for our European society.

------------------------------
Under the category "European Parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Monday, 13 April 2009

The Commission recommends its staff to be intransparent

In a Vademcum (handbook) leaked on Wikileaks it has become obvious that the Commission is advising its staff to write documents and emails in way that allow maximum intransparency.

I quote from the document (the most important things are on page 13):
When writing a report, avoid recording statements which may turn out to be politically embarrassing for those who have made them and avoid adding such comments to the report itself.
In other words, don't write everything that actually happened into your reports, but just record content that doesn't reveal the true intentions of actors. For emails:
[D]on't refer to the great lunch you have had with an industry representative privately or add a PS asking if he/she would like to meet for a drink
In other words: Don't leave any written proof that you are influenced by lobbyists and outside interests.
The best thing to do [when writing a report; JF] is to make two separate documents, i.e. one factual report, and a separate one with the assessment of the report (and possibly suggestions for follow-up). By doing this, we avoid having to "whiten" certain parts of the report, which creates an additional work burden (scrutinise the documents, determine what has to be deleted and justify why it has been deleted …) and which always carries a risk of confirmatory action, or even recourse to the Ombudsman or the Court (who may ultimately find that the invocation of exception grounds was not justified and even order the deleted parts to be disclosed …)
Or, differently said: Try to separate relevant parts from irrelevant parts of reports, because then it is easier to hide the relevant (i.e. judgemental) parts from the public.

This is very revelatory and although it is not surprising it is still shocking to see it on paper.

Congratulations, EU Commission, for your organised intransparency!


(via europa transparent coming via Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) coming via EUobserver)

Read also:: Commission staff teaches others how it can be lobbied

The story of a survey on the European elections

I have seen this some two days ago, and I wanted to write about it. But until now I didn't find the time to do so. But it's an excellent European (EU) story, so let's do it like this:

I tell you now that a post on an EU-wide survey on the European Parliament elections on the Coulisses de Bruxelles blog has turned into a veritable debate.

And later today or during the next days I will update this post and tell the full story for those of you who don't speak French.

If you agree, I'll do it like this.

Sunday, 12 April 2009

Examples of law-making in the Council: Measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel

Law-making is very intransparent in the Council of the European Union; getting the preferences of the different actors in the process is very hard and extremely time-consuming.

One problem is that positions put forward by member states are not made public in time, and that the presentation of these documents is not at all citizen-friendly.

Take for example the Council Regulation establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel which has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 18 September 2007.

If you wanted to see the opinions of your country on the proposal by the Commission from 6 October 2005, you had to wait until this weekend to find the respective documents published.

I have tried to assemble all those more than 70 documents made public now, so that you do not need to search on your own, just to show what you have "missed" so far.

Member states' comments in November 2005:
Working Party on Internal Fisheries Policies (January/February 2006)
Member states' comments in February 2006:
Member states' positions in June 2006:
COREPER meeting on 15 November 2006:
Compromise proposal 06 February 2007:
Positions in January & February 2007:
In March 2007:
In April 2007:
Input from May 2007:
All these documents have been published only now. I am sure that these are not all documents, and that with a little research I would find a bunch more. And we are just talking about a minor issue - eel - and the situation is much worse for other policy areas and more sensitive topics.

The time it took to put together this blog post is already way to much.

How can you expect any citizens to do this, look for hours for two or three documents that concern the position of its country during a European law-making process, or even to put together the full set of positions of all member states?!

And so far, I haven't analysed a single document. I have just put them together. The next step would be to analyse the individual positions and to see how these figure in the different intermediary documents and in the final regulation. But this would implicate much more research, going well beyond these Council documents.

What I want to say is that we get relevant documents late, we get them in a bad presentation, and we need to enter into an almost scientific research process to understand who got what, which position came through, what was ignored, etc.

And since the regulation is already 1 1/2 years old: Who will involve in such an effort? - No journalist will take the time to do so, and my resources as an individual blogger are way to limited to do this on a regular basis.

In the end, most decision-making within the Council, even if well-documented and finally publicised, will never become truly public and transparent - just because this transparency demands retrospective efforts that the institutional side doesn't want to bear and that the democratic society cannot take on its shoulders alone.

Saturday, 11 April 2009

Heaven or hell: Will Moldovan protests enter the next stage tomorrow?

For tomorrow, 11 am EET (10 am CET), the three main opposition parties in Moldova are calling for new protests on the Piaţa Marii Adunări Naţionale (PMAN), demonstrating against the harsh reprisals of the Communist regime during the last days.

In order to understand the situation, I have tried to get voices from Moldova during the last days.

What I get are responses that openly show that very optimistic or at least realistic people have become very negative since Tuesday. Most express fear and confusion about a situation that is new in Moldova, unseen in the last 20 years. Most think that the riots which broke out last Tuesday were provoked by actors that would profit from a situation in which the demonstration against alleged frauds during the elections would not end peacefully.

I see and hear open criticism about the international community in Chisinau and abroad, for its lack of action, for its diplomatic restraint. But I have also heard criticism about the political opposition that lacks true leadership and which continued what it was doing during the election campaign: Jumping from complaint to complaint, but mostly without presenting professional proof for the allegations.

But is most striking is the shocked tone when people describe the reactions from the Communist authorities during the last days, arresting hundreds of young people, beating national and expelling international journalists, blocking independent and critical news sources, provoking a diplomatic conflict with Romania. Even people who have seen worse in the past are horrified by what is going on now.

And what I see now is determination for tomorrow's demonstrations.

I am not sure whether the opposition will get enough people on the streets to make itself heard, in Moldova and abroad, especially with the overrated Twitter #pman hashtag being just noise by now. I am not sure whether certain elements will not be able to turn a protest that is intended to be peaceful into violent demonstrations again.

And I am not sure about the reactions of a state and its authorities which have shown considerable paranoia lately - a state which might be ready to overreact against its own citizens in the best manners of an autocratic state that is afraid of losing control and that has received open support for repressive measures by Russian authorities, those Russian authorities that also foster the internal but internationalised conflict with the separatist Transnistrian region in Moldova.

The question is: Where is Moldova going tomorrow - to heaven or to hell?

Previous articles in this blog:

A book. A garden. Europe.

I have read a book. And I did some gardening.

You might ask what this has to do with a blog about Europe and European politics.

Not much.

Just that the fact that I can spend some time with gardening and reading without much to worry is because I live in an environment that gives me the time and freedom to do so.

Sometimes, in our area of wealth and relative freedom - of unrecognised luxury - we tend to forget about these conditions. But before and after reading a diverting book and preparing a garden for the beauty of spring I still think about these conditions, and about those who are not as lucky as I am.

I suppose that this is why I am blogging. About reading and gardening. And Europe.

Friday, 10 April 2009

European Parliament elections 2009 (79): Can You Hear Me Europe?

Looks like the Commission, in co-operation with MTV, is getting something done ahead of the European Parliament elections.

A youth campaign under the label
Can You Hear Me Europe?
is trying to get the voices of young voters, both in the campaign and on the ballots in June.

Poland in the EU had already put to our attention a campaign spot running on MTV some days ago, but I have to admit I didn't really get it when I saw it. I wasn't even interested, because the message of what was going on did not make it into my brain.

Yet, having a look at the campaign website, I see that the goal is to collect the voices of the European youth in a collective shout, making the campaign motto "Can you hear me Europe" echo across the Union.

The "big shout" shall take place on 30 April 2009, at 15.30 and everyone is invited to record their own shouts and to upload them to MTV for a special show which will be broadcasted ahead of the elections.

In addition, three major events are supposed to be organised by MTV in Milan, Berlin, and Prague, the locations are displayed on the site.

I don't know whether this will work, especially since 30 April is a school and working day, but maybe with the help of Twitter - the campaign organisers have introduced a special hastag #CanEUhearme - we'll be able to get some crowd out there that shouts at Europe.

If things go well, other cities should also manage to organise their own mass events, co-ordinated by Twitter, Facebook, and whatever else is out there to communicate collectively. Flash mobs could be funny, too...

I think I will try to be in Berlin on that day and time, and to shout with the crowd, how big or small it may be.

Who will shout with me?

Update: After reading two rather negative posts, by Bruno Waterfield and Pubic Affairs 2.0 - they both sound like old guys who don't like the slogan or criticise the lack of content - I would like to add some reasons why I am favouring this campaign, although I am not fully convinced that it will work:

Europe is more than just the right message, Europe is more than just good arguments, Europe is also a feeling, it is a new focus of attention; Europe still is a question mark where you don't know whether you are actually heard when you shout. Maybe you just disturb your neighbour.

Having something like shouting for or at Europe will exactly raise the questions that are important to ask: At whom are we actually shouting? Who will hear us? Is this enough? What can we do in addition?

I admit, shouting a simple question is not very intellectual. It doesn't transport a particular message. But it is easy to do. It doesn't exclude those who don't know much about EU politics. It doesn't exclude those who are europhile or those who are eurosceptic.

But if it works, it will bring together young people who will be aware of European Parliament elections and who might make their peers aware of these elections. It might create room to discuss Europe and European politics. And although this particular campaign is "patronising", coming from above, it offers a starting point for more creative activities, new events, videos etc.

Because if we are willing to do more, we won't let ourselves patronise, we will create and recreate - and Cédric has shown how you can use a campaign from above and to remodel it creatively. Sometimes it needs a stupid little event-based campaign to get the ball rolling!


Read also: Kosmopolit's post "EP elections made cool(er)"


------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Thursday, 9 April 2009

Human rights and the rule of law in Moldova under attack after the protests

Without quoting particular sources, Nicu Popescu writes about the situation in Chisinau today:
An update on today from Chisinau: “No protests today. However, there have been lots arrests, principally of young people. Police are going to homes, asking for student lists at university. Procedures are apparently not respected – no arrest warrants, no special treatment for juveniles, not clear if distinctions are made between protestors and spectators. Families and lawyers do not have access to people who’ve been arrested. They are told by the police that no such person is in custody. Even the ombudsman has been denied access.

Many of the principal members of civil society have drafted a declaration, to be published today. It contains the following elements: Information on the situation on the ground; Asks authorities to keep within the law, to respect freedom of movement and others rights, and refrain from inflammatory acts; Makes public a partial list of people who’ve been arrested.

Moldovan Ombudsman suspects police is torturing arrested children.
This doesn't sound like a state that respects human rights and the rule of law. This doesn't sound like a democratic society where European values are respected. This sounds like the hard reaction of a state that is not interested in the respect for its citizens, no matter how negative the events of the last days have been.

(In between, the official final results have been announced: Communists 49.48%, Liberal Democrats 12.43%, Liberals 13.14% and Alliance "Our Moldova" 9.77% have made it into parliament; with these figures the Communists won't have the 61 seats they need to elect the president on their own, but will need one or two opposition votes. If they don't manage to do so, there will have to be new elections.)

European Parliament elections 2009 (78): The positive effects of campaign exchanges

One word to start with: Do you have the feeling that the European Parliament elections are coming closer? For me it feels like they are further away than ever, that less is going on, that interest is shrinking ahead of June, not raising.

On the other hand, I can read very interesting things, like this PES post on campaign exchanges. I find this initiative excellent, and I would urge all European parties, and in particular their youth organisations which have called for a true European campaign recently, to foster those exchanges.

A campaigner from another country can significantly change the dynamics of street or door-to-door campaigning. Somebody asks a critical question about domestic politics - and the campaigner can argue that this is not about domestic issues but about European questions: "Look, we even have a friend from country XYZ with us, and together we fight for the cause ZYX [and then: The manifesto of the European party]." It can be easier to come into conversations with potential voters, because they might just be interested in the European foreigner, her/his motives etc. which will ease to pass the political message.

These exchanges will also help to shape the next European Parliament elections, because the experiences of common problems and different perspectives can be helpful design true European campaigns in the future, something which is only in its infancy today, no matter what the European parties are saying. My feeling is that so far the European campaigns are designed mostly from a Brussels perspective, they don't really seek the connection of the supranational level with the local campaigning, apart from some particular events which however seem to be designed to be visible in Brussels instead of being visible "on the ground".

Another argument, very campaign strategic, for having exchanges is mentioned in the PES article: Having exchange campaigners can be a good topic for the local press, both in the home area of the campaigner and on the spot where s/he is visiting. Since it changes the perspective of the campaign, local or regional press might become interested. This can help to shape a particular positive European profile on the local level, it might raise the perceived competence in European matters, and it raises credibility of statements on European issues because voters/readers will see that the respective party organisations does something practical and inherently European.

For me, Europe is about exchanges.

It is the exchange of friendship and opinions, of knowledge and experience, of solidarity and perspectives, an exchange over and across the formerly dividing concepts of "nation" or "culture". The European elections are a political manifestation of these (ex-)changes, and they should therefore bring changes: In style, in attitude, in human faces.

So exchange, campaigners - and change!

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Wednesday, 8 April 2009

Europatweets.eu: MEPs on Twitter united

A new initiative - europetweets.eu - brings together the Tweets of all MEPs who use Twitter. Very nice tool.

One example of a tweet I just saw:
ALDE JeanineHennis (Jeanine Hennis): Proud to be a MEP. Though - sometimes I feel like living in la-la land (listening to some of my colleagues..;-))!!
Welcome to la-la land, the world of Twitter!

The Moldovan case: Some backgrounds on the political situation

Many of you might have been wondering about what is going on in Moldova these days.

You might have been realising by now that after Sunday's elections that resulted in a landslide victory of the ruling Communist Party, yesterday demonstrations and riots started in Chișinău (spoken: Kee-shee-now).

But what is the background of the story?

Moldova has been a semi-presidential republic until 2000. Until then, the president was elected directly by the people. The present President Vladimir Voronin (Communist Party) was the first president to be elected under the new constitution which requires a 3/5 majority of the parliament's votes (61 out of 101). Nevertheless, the institution of president under Voronin remained the most visible and most influential political post in the country, no matter if constitutionally the parliament incorporates the highest constitutional powers.

Still, after two terms in office, Voronin needs to step down as president now, whatever the results of the elections will be. Speculations before the elections were saying that after the elections Voronin might change his formal position and become, for example, speaker of the parliament or prime minister, which in practice would mean a shift of power to whatever institution Voronin would chose to go to, since not the formal position but the backing of the Communist Party, the important financial assets of his son and other unclear connections were the basis for his power.

The story of these elections starts, to a certain extend, with the local elections of 2007 where the Communists lost their power in many municipalities, towns, and also rayons (the Moldovan regions). Possibly in consequence of realising this defeat, the electoral law was changed in April 2008, the three major changes being:
  • the electoral threshold for parties was raised from 4% to 6%
  • electoral blocs, that is joint lists of different parties, were forbidden
  • candidates with double citizenship (which mostly means: Moldovan and Romanian) were not able to enter parliament
These changes were openly and clearly criticised by the OSCE/ODIHR and the Council of Europe's Venice Commission in a Joint Opinion from October 2008, recommendations that were openly rejected by the government, the president, and the parliamentary majority of the Communists.

Constitutionally, the elections had to take place between early March and early June, but were only called officially on 2 February 2009 for April 5. Over the course of the registration period 15 parties (out of 28 officially registered) were applying to run in these elections, plus 8 independent candidates of which 2 were rejected due to lack of valid signatures.

I won't go into details, because the interim reports by the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission (linked here) give quite a good overview over the details of the pre-electoral campaigns.

Some words on the opposition: The three parties that have made it into the parliament now were the most likely competitors to pass the 6% threshold: The Liberal Democratic Party of Moldova (PLDM), the Liberal Party, and the Alliance "Our Moldova" (AMN).

The PLDM with its leader Vlat Filat was one of the main players during the election campaign. The party has been founded in 2007 and evolved quickly as a "new" opposition force, highly visible and able to dominate the agenda from the opposition side, in particular through its positively charismatic leader and a diverse team of advisors. They were able to organise two large demonstrations with more than 10,000 demonstrators on the large central place in Moldova that has gained international attention under the hashtag #pman (Piaţa Marii Adunări Naţionale, the Place of the Great National Gatherings).

The PL is led by Mihai Ghimpu, but more important is the very young Dorin Chirtoacă, his nephew, who has been elected Mayor of Chisinau in the third round of the local elections of 2007. He represents the young generation, those who have not been in powerful or administrative positions in the Soviet period. However, as a Mayor of Chisinau he was not able to fulfil the hopes of the young generation.

AMN is lead by Serafim Urecheanu, the former Mayor of Chisinau. This party, the rests of an electoral bloc that entered the last parliament in 2005 and fell apart quick after the elections, was the big winner of the 2007 regional elections. It managed to have a decent regional and local structure, something only the Communists had at the time and which was still their biggest advantage during the campaigning for these elections. AMN is also member of the European Liberals and Democrats, which is why AMN's youth organisation received some European attention during the campaign.

Already before the election day it was clear that the election process could not be regarded as completely free and fair.

This concerned, from the very early stages, in particular the media situation in the country, with the National Radio and Television (TeleRadio Moldova, TRM), the only Moldovan broadcaster that can be received by everyone in the country, being hardly accessible for the opposition forces apart from the participation in electoral debates and the broadcasting of two minutes of electoral spots per day during the two month (minus the time until registration) of the election campaign. Observers also noted the use of administrative resources by the president and the government for the electoral campaign as well as intimidation of campaigners, observers, and voters.

Another dimension is adding up to the present situation: the relations with Romania. The independent statehood of Moldova was contested by certain political forces from the beginning - and it is still a contested in issue in Moldova today. The Moldovan language is in fact a Romanian dialect and at the beginning the "state language" (which is the diplomatic/administrative term for the Moldovan Romanian) was clearly named as "Romanian" but erased from the constitution later, in particular because of the large Russian minority and the practice of Russian being a second lingua franca in Moldova.

Yet, there are still forces in Moldova who consider the country part of the larger Romanian state, and the Moldovan government has accused the Romanian authorities several times that they would foster these movements, inter alia by issuing Romanian citizenship to Moldovans with ancestors in the former greater Romania (which is why the double citizenship clause was included into the electoral law; see above).

Border controls to Romania had already been tightened before the elections, in connection to claims that Romanians were planning a coup - which the Moldovan authorities now see confirmed by the raising of Romanian flags during the demonstrations yesterday, and which is why the Romanian ambassador has been asked today to leave the country and Romanian citizens will need a visa to go to Moldova from today.

In addition, since many students from Moldova are studying in Romania - among other things because of the corruption in the Moldovan education system - there were more issues at the border stations where several students who wanted to join the protests in the home country were stopped and not allowed to enter their country.

I will stop here. Altogether, this is a pretty tricky situation, and I am watching carefully what is going on there.

Tuesday, 7 April 2009

Developing story: Violent demonstrations in Moldova after Sunday's elections

I just received a text message from Moldova telling me that a demonstration against Sunday's election results that started this morning at 10 am has turned violent. Stones are flying towards the Parliament and the Presidential Palace. Police reacts with water cannons.

Developing story... See also my previous post from yesterday on the election outcomes and these background information to understand why this (might have) happened.

Update (16:30): Spoke to somebody on the phone who is in Chisinau. I was told that President Voronin is meeting the three main opposition leaders as well as the representatives of the European and international community today. Meanwhile, protests continue in the city centre of Chisinau, without main developments lately.

Update (20:15): In a video you can see discussions between the president, the opposition parties, and the other communist leaders. The video is in Romanian, but you can see the most important political figures of Moldova: In the centre, President Voronin, on the right the three main opposition politicians Vlad Filat (Liberal Democratic Party PLDM; next to the president), Dorin Chirtoaca (the mayor of Chisinau, Liberal Party PL), and Serafim Urecheanu (Alliance "Our Moldova" AMN), and on the left the speaker of the Parliament Marian Lupu and the Prime Minister Zinaida Greceanîi. According to news reports, they have agreed on a recount, although I am not sure whether this could be counted as a win for the opposition because the results so far were only preliminary results that will have to be confirmed anyway. But as far as I can understand, it also about waiting with the recognition of the final results until all complaints by the opposition have been filed and dealt with by the Central Election Commission.

-----

Follow the story on Twitter:
Check the Moldovan site Unimedia with live information, videos, and photo material.
Some video footage from Chisinau:
Violence:

Video of presidential palace destruction: http://www.cyberculture.ro/blog/2009/04/07/video-proteste-la-chisinau/

Photos:
zzzop
Vladimir Plamadeala
On livejournal
Fire in the Parliament (unimedia)
During the morning (unimedia)
On Moldovarious.com
Benia on livejournal

Other blogs:
Nicu Popescu
INconstantIN
Scraps of Moscow
Kosmopolito
On the "Twitter Revolution"
Dumitru arguing against nationalistic tendencies

Statements:
EU Council expresses concerns (PDF)
OSCE in Moldova condemns violence
Council of Europe asks for dialogue
President Voronin calls actions a "putsch"

European Parliament elections 2009 (77): Weekly polls on predict09.eu

A new initiative - http://www.predict09.eu - has entered the scene making outcome predictions for the upcoming EP elections based on national opinion polls and a statistical prediction model using experiences from past European Parliament elections.

The results they display on their main page differ visibly from the results of a combined opinion poll published in February, so the mathematical model used seems to have an effect on the predictions.

It's political science, so we'll see whether it works or not. If it doesn't work, we'll get good explanations why. That's political science.

Update: A critical account from Belgium.

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

European Parliament elections 2009 (76): PES and JEF activists request socialist candidate for EU Commission presidency

In an open letter addressed to the Spanish and Portuguese Prime Ministers and published on Taurillon, two PES members from Britain and Spain - both also members of the Union of European Federalists (UEF) and in leadership positions at the Young European Federalists (JEF) - ask for a socialist candidate for the EU Commission presidency:
When probing why the PES failed to nominate a candidate in Madrid, to go along with its pan-European manifesto, the blame lies squarely at your feet, Messrs Prime Ministers. You, the two socialist leaders of Spain and Portugal, already assured Mr. Barroso late last year of your support for him to serve a second term as EC president, despite the fact that he is a leader of the European People’s Party (centre-right).

[...]

As PES activists, we are well placed to know that the elections will be at best an uphill battle. If the election were held today, the EPP would win by a landslide.

[...]

For the PES to win the election, a significant new factor needs to come in play. Having a candidate would make a substancial difference! Putting a face and a name on the Manifesto’s action would help enormously in imparting the PES’s message that a new direction is needed for Europe. Additionally, Mr. Barroso is strongly disliked by large parts of the electorate for his general lack of leadership, but is practically guaranteed under the status quo to keep his post; merely giving the choice to voters to elect someone else at the EC presidency would be a giant step for European democracy, as well as a strategic move for the PES.
This letter comes very late, but it asks something that would be natural in a national polity:

Political leaders from the same party should not support the candidate of the opponent. When regionalistic or nationalistic politics won't dominate over the politics of ideas, of principles, of values anymore, there might be room for a European democracy, but as long there is no choice, we'll just remain in the antechamber of a democratic polity.

I hope the open letter will be seen and heard in Madrid and Lisbon. For the sake of democracy.

------------------------------
Under the category "European parliament elections 2009" I am following up national and European activities on the path to the European Parliament elections 2009.

For an overview over all articles in this category have a look at the overview article.

For the five newest post see also the sidebar.

Monday, 6 April 2009

Anyone but Blair: Stop Blair!

For those of you who have been celebrating the success of Anyone but Barroso! and for those of you still looking for a cause, you can now join a new anti-action:
STOP BLAIR!
This goes against proposals and rumours which see Tony Blair as first EU Council President who would take office for 2 1/2 years after the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

The main and strong arguments of the petition are Blair's support of the Iraq war and his fight against the inclusion of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms into the Lisbon Treaty.

For more, read the petition of the initiative.

(via Kosmopolit on Twitter)

Modern pirates conquering the European Union on party boats

In a blog post on Taurillon, the never satisfied Cédric covers the creation of "Pirate Parties" all over Europe, hinting inter alia to the international platform that these new formations have put up.

To make it very short: These Pirate Parties focus - broadly speaking - on the politics of new communication technologies and all questions related to these developments: Open Access, censorship, scientific exchanges, transparent governance etc.

Cédric concludes that only in Sweden these parties will be able to play a role for the upcoming European Parliament elections, but that there might be room for development for the future.

Looking at their platform's website, there is indeed much room for development...

Elections in Moldova: Governing Communists win, opposition demands re-elections - updated (3x)

The election results in Moldova are not fully in by now, but the counting of almost 98% of the votes shows the following results:
  • 50% for the Communist Party (PCRM)
  • 12.75% for the Liberal Party (PL)
  • 12.26% for the Liberal Democratic Party (PLDM)
  • 9.81% for the Alliance "Our Moldova" (AMN)
  • no other party passes the 6% threshold
I have to admit that these results are not completely surprising taking into account a recent opinion poll and considering the fact that those who are dissatisfied with the situation in the country and with the government of the Communists have left and were not able to vote in large numbers.

If the results are confirmed in these exact proportions, the Communist Party would have exactly reached the needed 61 seats majority (out of 101) to elect a new president. If this changes to below 61 seats, and if the opposition block keeps its statement from yesterday, this could mean the need for repeated elections. However, all deputies from the three "liberal" opposition parties would need to stick to the party line.

Now, I see great disappointment among my Moldovan friends, disappointment over these election results that have confirmed an autocratic government that is massively favoured by the public newscaster, the only TV and Radio that can be received by all citizens in the Republic of Moldova.

I am waiting to see whether the observers - national and international - have found any frauds on election day yesterday, but I suppose that only minor incidents will be reported. The disfavouring conditions for the opposition were already existing before yesterday, especially given the media situation and the large Diaspora that was unable to vote. In the reports issued in the pre-electoral phase by national and international observers, also incidents intimidating opposition politicians and the usage of administrative resources during the election campaign have been brought up.

I'll follow the developments of this country on the border - on the border of the EU and on the border to democracy - which it should cross better sooner than later!

Update: The opposition parties have announced not to accept the election results and to follow-up with actions. A Facebook event inviting young people to protest on the main street of Chisinau (Moldova's capital) has been created. Indeed, several thousand young people are demonstrating in central Chisinau.

And I spoke with an insider on the ground who told that some remote voting stations were showing strange turnout curves over the day, although there is no proof for irregularities (yet).

Also: Video of international observers' press conference and preliminary report

(Updated 11:47; 12:35; 16:10, 17:55)

Sunday, 5 April 2009

Laurent Schouteten new president of the EPP Youth

The 28-years old French UMP member Laurent Schouteten (photo) has been elected new president of the Youth of the European People's Party (YEPP) on Friday.

Schouteten has been a vice president of YEPP in the previous term and replaces the Greek Ioannis Smyrlis. It looks like both were running against each other for these elections.

More: