Showing posts with label eurozone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eurozone. Show all posts

Wednesday, 12 May 2010

The regulation of regulations

Many have said much about the plan that was made to save the Euro and the Union.

But why say so much when it can be said as cold-blooded as in Article 1 of the regulation that has changed the Union:
"With a view to preserving the financial stability of the European Union, this Regulation establishes the conditions and procedures under which Union financial assistance may be granted to a Member State which is experiencing, or is seriously threatened with, a severe economic or financial disturbance caused by exceptional occurrences beyond its control, taking into account the possible application of the existing facility providing medium-term financial assistance for non-euro-area Member States' balances of payments, as established by Regulation (EC) No 332/2002."
These are the words that are worth 60,000,000,000 Euro (this sum is not mentioned anywhere in the regulation) and they are followed by words in the second article that are probably historic in the constitutional history of the European Union:
"[T]he Commission shall be empowered on behalf of the European Union to contract borrowings on the capital markets or with financial institutions."
Just to repeat that: A regulation by one institution, the Council, gives new fundamental, quasi-constitutional powers to the another institution of the European Union, the Commission, namely to make debts on the financial markets.

In other words, the Council has given itself the quasi-constitutional right to create quasi-constitutional rights for the Commission. In a meeting that lasted just half a day.

Let's face it: This is the "regulation of regulations".

Picture: © tpcom / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Monday, 10 May 2010

Europe in blogs - Euroblogs (17): Eurozone

Euroblogs have reacted strongly and quite differently to the decision taken by the finance ministers in the EU Council early today.

Gavin Hewit: "staggering", "the nuclear option"

EU Weekly: "un plan ambitieux, impressionnant, couteux"

Tony Barber: "Mother of all rescue plans"

Europabloggen.no: "D-dag for euroen"

Bruno Waterfield: "a lie"

The European Journal: "a Swan song of the current oversized EU machine?"

Charlemagne: "stunning", "a revolutionary shift", "fiendish complexity"

Vision for EU: "unthinkable even 3 months ago"

Joe Litobarski: "a compromise solution in an attempt to avoid full fiscal union"

Eva en Europa: "Espero que no farem tard."

Centre for European Reform: "the EU is still working on a false premise"

Konrad Niklewicz: "Przecież Unia nie jest zagrożona i nie trzeba jej ratować."

Gulf Stream Blues: "should have been agreed weeks ago"

Straneuropa: "Apertura positiva e euro in ripresa. Speriamo bene."

Cecilia Malmström: "och det är viktigt att vi nu får finansiell stabilitet"

Euros du Village: "les hésitations de la chancelière allemande ont coûté beaucoup"

Jean Quatremer: "Les marchés auront ainsi réussi à imposer la rigueur pour tous"

Alpha.Sources: "some economies in the Eurozone still face debt restructuring"

Global Dashboard: "At best however, the deal is a stopgap"

Brussels Log: "De kogel is door de kerk"

500 billion Euros


Update 1: Here are the official Council conclusions!

Update 2:
Just to put this into perspective: 60 years and one day after the Schuman declaration, a group of 27 states (or 16 in the case of the Eurozone) has just decided, basically in one meeting, to launch a stability package that is far beyond imagination and that is designed to secure financial security of the EU member states and the stability of the Euro.

We are not talking about soft issues and week diplomatic declarations, we are talking about a huge thing with hard economic consequences. We are witnessing a European Union that has cleared entered a new stage of supranationalism with this decision.

It is fascinating, I must admit.


On hour ago, the Finance ministers of the European Union have decided to secure the Euro with 500 billion Euros.

I've watched the press conference with Commissioner Rehn and Spanish Finance Minster Salgado in the web stream and I also live-tweeted.

Here is what I understood (the official decisions have not yet been published on the web)*:

The 500 billion are split into two different mechanisms. The first is a "community mechanism" based on Article 122(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:
"Where a Member State is in difficulties or is seriously threatened with severe difficulties caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences beyond its control, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may grant, under certain conditions, Union financial assistance to the Member State concerned. The President of the Council shall inform the European Parliament of the decision taken."
Commissioner Rehn said that this article applied because the financial stability of the European Union and the Eurozone were threatened by the present situation, and that this situation was out of the control of the member states. The 60 billion Euro under this mechanism are managed by the Commission and are quickly available if needed.

The second mechanism is called a "special purpose vehicle" and it is an intergovernmental agreement between the Eurozone member states. In case that more than the initial 60 billion were needed, another 440 billion Euro could be made available by the member states of the Eurozone. In case they were requested, it would need unanimity of the Eurogroup to get the money released and the timeframe would be similar to the mechanism established for Greece (some weeks).

The 500 billion Euro from both mechanisms could, in addition, be supported by up to at least 250 billion Euros from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

In addition, member states have agreed to take fiscal measures to reduce their deficits. Spain and Portugal seem to have given special promises to tackle their budgetary situation with addition measures.

Altogether, the 11 hour negotiations of the EU finance ministers seem to have lead to a comprehensive and massive packaged that should show to financial markets that the Eurozone is ready to act to secure our currency.

PS: It is also worth reading Charlemagne's blog post, especially his late-evening and night updates at the end of the text.

* Please verify with the official decision taken; I was just listening to the press conference audio stream (English version).

Monday, 3 May 2010

LSE panel discussion on Greece with former ministers from Greece

Now is the time to learn more, and so why not turn to academia instead of the media to do so.

Last week, on 28 April, the London School of Economics held a panel discussion titled "The Greek Fiscal Crisis and the Future of the Euro-Zone" with two recent ministers of economy and finance from Greece and two more economists: Professor George Alogoskoufis, Dr Yannos Papantoniou, Professor Wim Koesters & Simon Tilford.

The mp3 of the event is available here, the video in this list. It's worth watching and listening, especially if you make it to the last third of podcast and questions like "What is wrong with national statistics in Greece?" pointed at former ministers of finance...

By the way: The LSE podcast are worth listening/watching for many other topics, too!